PHOTOGRAPHS FROM

"LAST OF THE NOBLE SAVAGE"

crossbow.jpg (38366 bytes)

Two Crossbowmen, November 1975

  Charles Bunch and James Bowman at the Kentucky Pioneer Weapons Area in Bath and Meniffee County.

vote.jpg (32865 bytes)

Vote, June 1973

Herb Wolf cleaning fish near Lunar on Rockcastle River.

 

boat.jpg (41981 bytes)

Paddle, August 1973

Herb Wolf and Charles Bunch on a float trip down Rockcastle River near U.S. 80 bridge.

 

 

herb.jpg (35559 bytes)

Last of Noble Savages

Herb Wolf on bow hunting trip above Lunar in Southern Rockcastle County.

Each Photo was printed in monocolor gum-bichromate.  Each photo was then hand colored.  The image size is less than eight by ten inches.   An eight by ten inch negative was made to produce the print. 

Below are pages from the booklet published at the time of the first showing of the "Noble Savage" show.  It defines the Gum-bichromate-watercolor pigment process.

 

 

milwakee.jpg (36680 bytes)

Beer Sipper, June 1974

Charles Bunch on Rockcastle River below Skeggs Creek.


The GUM-BICHROMATE-WATERCOLOR PIGMENT Process


Cibachrome prints will lose 10% of their color density if they are outdoors and at a 45degree angle toward the south within 20 days in the summer. If the prints are inside and six feet from a window and have no direct sun it will take 5 years to lose this 10%. Or under continuous tungsten light and no daylight, such as museum conditions, it will take 15 to 30 years. In any case they will not survive most of us.
Cibachrome is claimed to be the best for longevity among the common color processes.
All these processes use dyes and all dyes fade and are not permanent. Permanence itself is considered a requirement for fine art.
To solve the problem photographers can do two things. They can make all their photo's in black and white, as many do, or they can use color pigments.
In 1839 Mongo Ponton detected the light-sensitivity of dichromates.
In 1858 John Pouncy, an English professional photographer begin to experiment with gum arabic, pigment and potassium dichromate. He displayed some of his prints at the Photographic Society in London in April of 1858. The prints were criticized for their inferior tonal scale in comparison to silver prints. Silver prints are permanent but only as black and white and allow very little control after the photo is taken.
Gum prints did not come into wide use until the 1890's when theories of fine art photography began to change. Robert Demachy wrote that, "The beauty of the subject in nature has nothing to do with the quality that makes a work of art. This special quality is given by the artist's way of expressing himself." He added; "Meddling with a gum print may or may not add the vital spark, though without meddling there will surely be no spark whatever." The gum print although not as sharp and with less tonal quality allowed considerable control during printing and afterward.
This philosophy of print manipulation lasted about 15 years with all the great photographers at the turn of the century using it. However, it was not used as a permanent multi-color medium as I use it but as a permanent medium that allows extreme control.


Print manipulation declined around 1907 when aesthetic theories began to turn toward the sharp precise line of documentary photography. This was due to a great extent to the needs of photography for publication and to a lesser degree to the aesthetic theories that stated; "A photograph should do what it can do best, record reality, an image of a real time and a real place."
Many great photographers turned to commercial work but fine art photography survived in the super sharp non-manipulated, somewhat abstract photographs of Edward Weston and the Surrealist photographs of Man Ray.
Man Ray took photo theory farther and said. "Photo's should do what photography alone can do and painting cannot." Man Ray did many photographs in the 1920's and 30's using the Sabattier Effect and photograms.
I have taken the dominate current theory of recording reality within the limitations of the medium and gone farther and added what the photo is incapable of. I give the photo a permanent color by first using the gum/pigment/bichromate process and then adding permanent multi-color watercolor paint.
Many aesthetic factors are also taken into consideration. I first of all assume that the camera and film will record reality of time and place no matter what I do. I then concentrate on strong simple compositions. I prefer the diagonal. I also look for good eye control with line, color, and forms that draw the eye toward the major point of interest. This is all accomplished by moving the camera to the ideal spot.
It has been said that an attribute of a master painter is that you cannot move, remove, or change any portion of his painting and make it better. The master took what he had and did it the best it could be done.
The same can be said for the photographer. In his situation, you could not have moved the camera into any other position or released the shutter at any other time and made a better photograph.
That is what fine art or fine photography is; "The best that can be".
I have attempted, first through design manipulation then through print manipulation and finally through color manipulation, to make these images the best they can be.

RETURN TO NOBLE SAVAGE PAGE 1

RETURN TO INDEX PAGE